Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Homeless Man

Question: Complete the Upset by Homeless Man writing exercise.Complete the Letter to Policyholders about Billing Mistake writing exercise? Answer: Complete the New ID card Rewriting Exercise Based on the above stated notification, it is identified that the whole instruction of the administrative services is written on the basis of direct approach towards the employees of the organisation (Lockwood, 2012). In this context, it can be claimed that the writing order of the administrative services is absolutely adequate and ethical, which can be considered as a professional pattern. Finally, the administrative services have clarified how the audience will react if they are having any doubts/ queries (Yu, 2011). To: All employees Date: December 20, 2013 Subject: Important Notification Regarding New ID card Here, we are going to use a new type of card readers for identification purpose, which can be called as a proximity card. Every employee can collect their new ID card from their respective departments and their old cards will no longer in work after the implementation of our new software system. All the specifications regarding the proximity card is mentioned below: Last date of execution of old ID card: 24th August, Friday. First date of execution of new ID card: 27th August, Monday. If you have any questions regarding your proximity card, please contact: Frank Lindeman at 6804/ Eric Dillman at 2030 Thank you for your help. From: Administrative Services Upset by Homeless Man Writing Exercise In this letter, it is identified that Ms. Gerholt has written her first email by using direct approach towards the organisation. In this context, rationally it can be mentioned that during sharing the information Ms. Gerholt has applied straightforward statements for delivering the message (Lockwood, 2012). In this regard, it can be claimed that during the message through email, Ms. Gerholt has shared the information in a complicated manner, which has only demonstrated the issue but the flow of information little poor. Thus, it can be argued that the choice of order is not adequate i.e. (Yu, 2011). In order to critique Markleys response email, it can be argued that Markley has replied to Ms. Gerholt in a professional manner. Simultaneously, Markleys flow of information, structure and choice of order of the email was quite brilliant. In this context, it can be claimed that an individual should incorporate this particular approach during issue of an official mail (Lockwood, 2012). Dear, Ms. Gerholt The owner of the insurance agency is an independent business unit, which is not controlled by our organisation in any way. On the other hand, as you mentioned that the owner is not helping the neighbourhood or the police i.e. this vagrant. Therefore, as per your request I will have a talk with that agency owner regarding the issue. Hope you will understand my limitations and cooperation regarding the issue. Christopher D. Markley Letter to Policyholders about Billing Mistake Writing Exercise From the above stated letter, it is identified that the instruction of the letter is written on the basis of indirect approach towards the customers of the organisation. In this context, rationally it can be argued that during sharing the information with the customers the company had applied narrative statements for delivering the message (Lockwood, 2012). In this context, it can be argued that the message of the organisation is not clear, rather it can be considered as complicated and confusing. Thus, it can be claimed that the flow of information is poor i.e. (Yu, 2011). In this letter, the primary objective of the writer is to apologies to the customers for billing mistake. Simultaneously, the writer also wanted to address the quarries of the policyholders. In this context, based on the observation it is identified that the writer has not meet the objective of the letter in an adequate manner (Lockwood, 2012). This letter may raise confusion amid the readers mind and it may also lead negative impression on the organisation (Yu, 2011). Dear valued customer, Subject: Apology for Processing Error This is hear by inform to all our policyholders that our organisation has encountered a challenge in terms of processing error of your renewal policy, which has influenced difficulties i.e. of operations. If you received any policy renewal date between 31st, August to 2nd, September, then please disregard that message and consider this message as a final. We appreciate your cooperation and patience in completing this process. If you have any questions, please contact your agent. Thank you for your help. Reference List Lockwood, J. (2012). English Language Assessment for the Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO) Industry: Business Needs Meet Communication Needs. ELLS, 2 (4). Yu, X. (2011). Exploration of Schema in Business English Translation. ELLS, 1(2).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.